Shaukat Aziz is no doubt a clever person. He was an  ordinary employee in Citibank in Dubai where he made friends in the  royal family. He went to America and became a banker to a group of  global kingmakers. PML-N Senator (and then-finance minister) Ishaq Dar  brought him to Pakistan where he started advising the government on  economic issues. Mr Aziz’s aim was to become governor of the State Bank  of Pakistan and Ishaq Dar was about to do just that when the PML-N  government fell.
However, Mr Aziz immediately contacted a relative of Pervez Musharraf and  managed to speak to the army chief. The result was that he soon became  finance minister and later prime minster. In fact, Mr Aziz played his  cards so well that after Musharraf’s fall from power, he left the  country and is now leading a lavish lifestyle abroad. People blame  General Musharraf or the Chaudhry brothers for most of the ills of the  previous government, conveniently forgetting Shaukat Aziz’s doings. And  the irony is that he is still giving advice to poor countries on how to  run and improve their economies.
Now, I have to say, I have seen a very different Shaukat Aziz in a  meeting right before he left his post as prime minister. He told me he  was under pressure about what to do with the Lal Masjid  issue and the suspension of the chief justice of Pakistan. But what I  want to mention is three predictions he made at the time, all of which I  disagreed with, but which came true.
He said that Musharraf will get all his sins white-washed but the Akbar Bugti  murder would be his undoing and that certain evidence in that matter,  if and when disclosed, could make life difficult for him. “It will be a  difficult time for Musharraf and then the army will have to choose one;  Musharraf or Balochistan,” he had said.
The second thing he had said was that Nawaz Sharif will be able to  return home but America and Saudi Arabia will not let him speak freely  and that if the PPP and the PML-Q formed a government in the future,  Sharif will be “periodically active, periodically inactive.”
And the third was that a third power is using the bench and the bar  for its own interests. Ultimately the judges will get restored but the  lawyers will not let them work, creating a crisis where the bench and  bar will lock horns with one another. “Both will have an end similar to  ours,” he said.
The first two points have already become true. And now the lawyers  and the judiciary are pitched against each other, so much so that an  honest and principled district and sessions judge, Zawar Ahmed Shaikh, has been sent on forced leave.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 9th, 2010.





